<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Empiricist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.empiricist.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.empiricist.com</link>
	<description>Science, Technology, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:34:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The new conspiracy theory</title>
		<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-new-conspiracy-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-new-conspiracy-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiricist.com/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two months ago, before climategate, nobody ever talked about a climate &#8220;conspiracy theory&#8221;. People who didn&#8217;t believe in man-made climate change were not accused of being conspiracy theorists, they were simply &#8216;deniers&#8217;, denialists, contrarians and naysayers.
Now, thanks to climategate, we learn that there was a conspiracy to thwart Freedom of Information requests, manipulate data, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-new-conspiracy-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eight responses to seven answers</title>
		<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/8-responses-to-7-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/8-responses-to-7-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiricist.com/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Soon asked for feedback and opinions on the Scientific Article, Seven Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense.
Jason, since you asked, here&#8217;s my take on that article. I think it&#8217;s weak in many places, but particularly weak when it gets to climategate.
The Scientific American (SciAm) article by John Rennie looks at seven claims of so-called contrarians [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/8-responses-to-7-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Break time!</title>
		<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/break-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/break-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiricist.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have lots of real life things to do, which include earning money, childraising, other family stuff, and a book I&#8217;m working on.
I will return, at some as-yet-undetermined point in the future.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/break-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>maybe it&#8217;s good she&#8217;s retiring after all</title>
		<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/maybe-its-good-shes-retiring-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/maybe-its-good-shes-retiring-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiricist.com/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lily Allen is contributing to a remake of Midnight Oil&#8217;s Beds are Burning to get the message of climate change across for the Copenhagen talks.
Guys, that&#8217;s not art, that&#8217;s propaganda set to music. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/maybe-its-good-shes-retiring-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The global warming debate is over (at last)</title>
		<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-global-warming-debate-is-over-at-last/</link>
		<comments>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-global-warming-debate-is-over-at-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiricist.com/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past two weeks there have been some remarkable developments in the climate change debate. First, a key dataset used to prove the case for global warming has disappeared and those involved aren&#8217;t talking about it. See this article for more: The dog ate global warming, although it&#8217;s all over the blogosphere.
Then Steve Macintyre [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-global-warming-debate-is-over-at-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The limits of willpower</title>
		<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-limits-of-willpower/</link>
		<comments>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-limits-of-willpower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiricist.com/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently there&#8217;s a limit to willpower. Force yourself to do enough things that you don&#8217;t find easy or enjoyable, and you run out of willpower to keep making yourself do new things.
http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/006569.html
This is why it&#8217;s a good idea to make changes to your life one at a time. Routine is the solution here. Once something [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/the-limits-of-willpower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
