Two months ago, before climategate, nobody ever talked about a climate “conspiracy theory”. People who didn’t believe in man-made climate change were not accused of being conspiracy theorists, they were simply ‘deniers’, denialists, contrarians and naysayers.
Now, thanks to climategate, we learn that there was a conspiracy to thwart Freedom of Information requests, manipulate data, and subvert the peer review process.
All of a sudden, after we learn that there’s a verifiable conspiracy that most of us (certainly I) did not even suspect, climate skeptics are being labeled conspiracy theorists.
What rank dishonesty.
If you get busted for corruption, the best course of action, it seems, is to declare your accusers of being conspiracy theorists.
Blogroll
- Arts & Ammo
- Blair
- Boing Boing
- Boy on a bike
- City Journal
- Climate Debate Daily
- Dark Roasted Blend
- Edge
- Instapundit
- Jules Crittenden
- Kae
- kc
- Margos
- margos maid
- More intelligent life
- Nature
- Open letters monthly
- Paco
- Popular Mechanics
- Sci Tech Daily
- Spiked Online
- Suggest Ideas
- Support Forum
- TCS Daily
- Technovelgy
- Tizona Group
- Tracky Dacks
- WordPress Planet
- World Affairs Journal
- Zoe Brain
Tags
aid Australian politics babies brains china climate culture death democracy economics education epidemics epidemiology ethics euthanasia evolution foreign policy global warming health human nature ian plimer junk science life longevity markets medicine mental illness military technology music obama obesity public policy reviews robots science scientific method skepticism social policy statistics Stern Hu suicide swine flu universities US politics warMeta
Pages
Post a Comment