<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plimer debunked!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.empiricist.com/articles/plimer-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/plimer-debunked/</link>
	<description>Science, Technology, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:41:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.empiricist.com/articles/plimer-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.empiricist.com/?p=149#comment-25</guid>
		<description>To reiterate, I was not addressing the &quot;main thrust&quot;, I was focusing on expressed opinions of Plimer&#039;s book, Heaven and Earth. I understand that this was not the main thrust of either post.  

Now, since you are saying that you were offering no opinion on Plimer&#039;s book (despite the pejorative &quot;denialist&quot; adjective), and that your link was intended to highlight only Professor Clark&#039;s comments on the Australian and not his comments on &quot;Heaven and Earth&quot; in the same post, then I take you at your word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To reiterate, I was not addressing the &#8220;main thrust&#8221;, I was focusing on expressed opinions of Plimer&#8217;s book, Heaven and Earth. I understand that this was not the main thrust of either post.  </p>
<p>Now, since you are saying that you were offering no opinion on Plimer&#8217;s book (despite the pejorative &#8220;denialist&#8221; adjective), and that your link was intended to highlight only Professor Clark&#8217;s comments on the Australian and not his comments on &#8220;Heaven and Earth&#8221; in the same post, then I take you at your word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

